5.25.2010

Shoe-A-Pa-Looza



Love these summer sandals to run around in...test drove them all day at the zoo last week.

They passed on style and comfort.

Very buttery leather and well constructed, rivaling the good ole clogs.



But these are totally hot! They are NOT for the zoo, or anything requiring fast paced movement (you will not catch a runaway two year old). You can last awhile standing in them as long as there is a light at the end of the tunnel, i.e. a pretty chair to sit in that goes with shoes.

5.20.2010

Shots from the Dressing Room

We went shopping with our friend Holly last week. We each made a list of what we needed (all of us needed dresses and skirts, things for spring), and what we weren't allowed to buy (for me, black shirts or skinny jeans. For Holly, cotton shirts in solid colors. Denise wasn't supposed to buy anything, but...well, you'll see). We had two stores in mind: Daffy's and the Anthropologie basement. Just for the record, we made it to neither.

First stop, Brooklyn Industries:


Lots of spring items, and look! So many colors that aren't black or solid! Most of the spring clothes there were very light cotton, so there were some issues with clinginess. Still, there were some winners:


Questions arose:


Like, is this a dress or a shirt? I really, really wanted it to be four inches longer and a dress, because it was a pretty bad shirt (but a potentially excellent dress). Turns out, according to their website, it's a dress. For someone incredibly short.



Heading to Anthropologie we got sidetracked at Urban Outfitters, usually a store for small, young, rich people, but with an occasional excellent sale rack (I got jeggings, justified because they are not, technically, skinny jeans). Denise, who has an eye for the potential in all things, found this silk-esque jumper (romper? isn't that what babies wear?) AND had the good sense to buy it,

(find that skirt I have on here)

though it took a great deal of time in the dressing room before being sure.

Then we walked by Second Time Around en route to the never-reached Daffy's, and became giddy at the amount of cheap clothes and forgot about our camera. Someone exactly Denise's size had just dropped off a load of summer dresses, and Holly and I discovered that we are the same size but have completely opposite style, so we threw things over the wall between our dressing rooms to make sure the right person had the right skirt. And, I tried on a vintage Diane von Furstenberg wrap dress that looked so horrible on me I banned all cameras.

Holly got the one good picture in the place, and then we were off before we got a SECOND parking ticket on the day.

5.18.2010

Women We Love


We all have a style inspiration, someone with a look we think of in the morning as we’re getting dressed, someone we hear in our ear as we’re shopping, someone we try to imagine in our clothes so we can accessorize like they do. We’re fascinated to see what they come up with next. We wonder how they do it. We wish we could be as daring, or as colorful, or as comfortable in high heels or short skirts or large jewelry as they are.


We’re going to try to get in the closets of a few such women, the ones we can’t stop staring at when we see them. Welcome to Women We Love.

The first is Paz: artist and mother of two, with singular style.


What are you thinking about as you get dressed?



It really depends on the day and how I feel, where I am going, how much time I have. Time is always

lacking nowadays because I have two young children, but when there is time I play dress up...I look in

the mirror and I start by paying attention to how I feel at that moment: womanly, girly, androgynous,

luscious, serious, stoic...and then find something in my closet that will project those emotions. I even go

so far as to recreate stories in my head while I am dressing. I have done this all my life, first with my

mother’s clothes and shoes.



How would you describe your style?



Chameleonic. I like to play. I like to be many things: Ambiguous, womanly, a peasant girl, sophisticated,

sexy, flamboyant, invisible...


I am an artist and I look at the body abstractly as a groups of shapes and forms. Clothes are structures

that you add on to dramatize the different parts of the body, but I also look at color, weight, light, and

flow, because dressing is theatrical in nature and there are so many emotions you can communicate by

the way you dress.



Has your style changed as you have gotten older and had children?



I don't have the time to be as creative with the way I dress. So many times I end up just dressing without

much thought, but that has happened to everything in my life, not just clothes. Because my children are still

small I approach every thing in my life in a very utilitarian way.


Also, I have never been much of a trend follower and as I gotten older I have removed myself even further

from trends, and I like this. I wear what I like. Comfort plays a bigger factor now-a-days than when I was

younger. I now think of things like: Is my back going to hurt with those shoes the next day?

But perhaps the biggest and most welcome change that has occurred as I have gotten older is that I now

dress exclusively for myself, because when I was younger dressing was more of an action to get a reaction

from people.



Why is style important to you?



Style is how you present yourself to the world. It is a form of self expression and not only happens

with the clothes you wear, but also how you carry yourself, how you take care of your self, how you

talk, how you cook, how you decorate your house. Style is in everything you do. It is taking things

that by themselves do not have much meaning and creating a story, your story.



5.15.2010

Metal Chic


I adore this shirt, with it's crazy winged butterfly arms. It makes me feel very flow-y.


On the not-perfect side, if I lift my arms and you happen to take a peek, you get a healthy view of what's
happening inside the shirt.

There's a story to the belt buckle. When I was 17 and a hot young thing, I went to a GnR concert in Augusta,
Maine with two friends. We spent, maybe, 8 hours getting ready and I wore one of those bodysuits that were
so popular in the (very) early nineties. Now the idea of a snap-crotch makes me feel terrible, like I've either
got a newborn or a yeast infection.

But then, it was fabulous.

And I was convinced - totally, totally sure - that Axl Rose (or his henchmen) would see me in the audience
and point to me, and beckon me to join them backstage. I wasn't sure what would happen next, but I knew
it would be AWESOME.

So, nothing happened, because we were like a football field away from any of the action, and I think we
were, shall we say, not trying as hard to be noticed as some of the other ladies were. As a consolation at the
end of the night I bought a pair of underpants that were see-through, had the GnR logo, and a spray-painted
arrow straight down to the crotch. And probably, that was about as much action as I was really looking for.

But I have an abiding love for the GnR boys. And for my ever-hopeful and adventurous 17 year old self.
Shirt, consignment store; Jeans, Mossimo; Belt buckle, market in Thailand; Scarf, H+M; Sunglasses, J.Crew


5.13.2010

If You Show Me Yours...by LAUREN

(So you don't get bored of us, every week we post something sent to us by a reader or coerced out of friends and family. Could be a question, a letter, a poll, a picture...we're flexible. See below for this week's If You Show Me Yours post, and see the sidebar for info about how to participate!)


Booby Blues, or Life With the Wean-ee


If you choose to breastfeed, life before weaning your baby means that sometimes fashion must come second to boob-acces
sibility. When I had my first son two and a half years ago, I learned this the hard way. Read: one should not don a dress that's neck cannot be stretched down to access boob... because it sure isn't coming up the other way, if you know what I mean. Unless your baby is hungry in a crowded restaurant and you find yourself in the ladies' room with said dress pulled completely up to your neck while straddling a toilet seat and holding an impatient infant and trying not to piss off the lady waiting to use the one stall...

But I digress.

This time around, I gave in and bought a few cute (non-maternity, non-nursing) dresses and tops that were nursing-friendly. But oh, how I yearn for that which I cannot have. And so, as my nursing days (9 months of them, actually) soon come to a close, I present you with a few of my current favorites, all of which have proven to be completely, hopelessly, utterly impossible to breastfeed a baby in. Wooo-hooo!


The only way into this shirt is through the back...


Which is why I can't wait to wear it!


Shirt: Dear Creatures
Jeans: AG Stevie Slim Straight
Oxfords:
Jeffrey Campbell (a random gift from a good friend)
Bag: Lucky Wa
nt nyc

Now my next tidbit has proven somewhat controversial in the "age-appropriate" category. The romper. I decided to go with it because (1) I love it, (2) It's hot outside, and (3) I can't nurse in it without taking the entire top off. I think it can be age-appropriate (for reference, I'm 30) in the right context. For example, the beach. Or the 4th of July. Or errand-running with a cute yellow cardigan (which I do not have... yet) and flats. Oh, well. Here it is.




Romper: Anthropologie
Oxford Flats: Hispanitas (and super, super comfortable for running after toddlers)
Necklace: Handmade from a friend


I am also in love with the new high-waisted paper bag shorts and skirts out this season. I do think they are hard to pull off, but I found these shorts in a little store in
Fells Point for half-off and had to try them out. Of course, anything high-waisted requires a shirt tuck-in, and oftentimes this makes nursing difficult.






Shirt: 2K by Gingham
Shorts: Dear Creatures
Booties: Biviel


So there you have it. My favorite non-nursing wear for this summer... which of course, can wait at least one more month. I have babes to feed, you know.

Check out more of Lauren (in a moustache, no less!) on her blog, Crumb Buns.

5.10.2010

Not Your Daughter's Jeans, For Sure



What are the first three things that come to mind when you hear that there’s a product out there called Not Your Daughter’s Jeans?


For us: high waisted; light wash; pegged leg. Think Lands’ End catalog, women’s section. Beautiful models in unattractive, form-covering, age-increasing pants.


And this goes right to the heart of our perpetual question - is this where we’re at? Are we denying the fact that it is time for Lands‘ End jeans, and that we look embarrassingly inappropriate in our Forever 21 jeans? Are we wearing our daughter’s jeans, and should we get the hell out of them? Or, given that all of our daughters are pre-school age and we aren’t wearing jeans from The Children’s Place, is this even an issue?


We’ve been hearing rumors of jeans that might bridge the gap, giving nods where necessary to the fact that we aren’t 16 years old, while still looking good. And stylish. And affordable. Does it seem like too much to ask? So when we got wind of Not Your Daughter’s Jeans, we shuddered a bit at the name and went through a whole routine’s worth of mental gymnastics working ourselves up to finally admitting that we had to try them. Maybe they’d surpass our expectations, and we could wear them and look fabulous while also secretly re-naming them Daughter? What Daughter Jeans. Or, better yet, I’m Hot Jeans. Forget about the daughter altogether.


So off we went to our local Nordstrom’s, one lovely morning when all our kids were in school. We were skeptical, especially when a young and very hip saleslady we’d asked for directions shooed us out of her section towards the back. The rows of clothes we walked past got frumpier and flowery-er, like we were slowly headed into a bad neighborhood where we clearly didn’t belong.


But there they were - the NYDJ, racks and racks of them, tucked in among other older-lady gear like sweater-sets. Dark, light, black, white, skinny, bootleg, highly-rhinestoned back ends or regular plain rears, they had an impressive selection. The lovely saleswoman advised to go small, because they stretch (2% spandex) and, in her words, give you a tummy tuck. DING DING! Like magic, those words. We were on the (preschool) clock so we took a fast pass, grabbed a bunch, and went in.


First thing, they were tight. Real, real tight. But in a good way, not in a hanging-out-over-the-top way, or a can’t-bend-at-the-knee way. More of an I’m-being-cradled-gently-in-all-the-right-places type of thing. You will certainly want a small size, and nothing more than a small meal before trying them on.



Second thing, they were high.



They were the highest jeans I’ve had on in decades, pretty much since the minute my mother stopped dressing me. They fully covered my belly button, and I’m a tall person. This makes everyone back away slowly, we know. We were skeptics initially, too, and the high-waisted jean is, generally, a bad thing. But this highlighted a difference in our bodies - I am tall and big-waisted, and Denise is small and big-hipped. For her, they were so high she would want to cover the waist with a long shirt, which means she loses a good part of her bod - her tiny waist. But for me, it was surprisingly good, like all the benefits of maternity pants on top with all the jazziness of good jeans below. I always wear long shirts anyway, because my waist is never something I'd care to highlight. Plus, check me out testing the bend-worthiness of these babies - no crack! All the parents at preschool will rejoice and buy stock in this company if it gets me to cover my bum.



Third thing, they were comfortable. The 2% spandex is a big helper on that one, though there was some legitimate concern there might be a bit too much of the stuff...we didn’t want to cross any lines into jegging-territory, nor did we want them sagging after one wear, and we worried a bit that they were so stretchy it wandered into elastic-waist-land. But they were very snug without pinching or restricting, and believe me when I tell you again that we were in some unusually small sizes. Denise put the comfort issue to the test by locking herself out of her dressing room:



Fourth thing, they looked pretty damn good. We did hit a snag with the white jeans, which (as you know) Denise has gotten a bee in her bonnet about. She tried, she really did, but they were VERY TIGHT and VERY SEE-THROUGH and VERY BUMP-HUGGING, though not in the cute baby-bump way and more in the bumpy-thigh way. This, again, was a difference for us. Denise wanted more structure in the hips and thighs, slightly less cling so they flowed over her curves rather than snuggling up to them. For me, there's no such thing as too tight on the hips and legs. So the white were out, sadly. The other colors, though, looked real good, especially the darker they were.



Price tag is $100. We shrieked a bit at that, since we’re cheap Target shoppers, but allowed our minds to roam back a bit through the many pairs of thrifty but ill-fitting pants we’ve bought over the years trying to find the perfect fit, and wondered if our money might have been better spent in one place on one really good pair. It might be worth it, given how much we wear jeans.



Finally, to the issue of who these jeans are meant for - that is a tricky one. They are hidden way back in a spot in the store that screams “over 50.” The voices they use for their ads on the website aim directly at that same age bracket. The name - Not Your Daughter’s Jeans - does the same thing for us. And HELLO - we don’t even have children old enough to wipe their own butts, much less compete with us for clothes. But away from it all, in the dressing room, we liked them. We could imagine wearing them. We wished they would change the name of them, since we think we can honestly admit that we will never tell someone that we are wearing “Not Your Daughter’s Jeans,” but that seems more like a marketing problem for them rather than an actual issue for us. Hell, I buy a size 13 in the junior’s section if it’s something I like - surely that can go the other way, right? Why not buy a small size in something aimed at folks 15 years older than me if it looks and feels good?


But we know - WE KNOW - that buying in your mother’s section is flat out different than buying in your babysitter’s section. So you have to decide if you can make the walk to that dark and scary part of Nordstroms for the jeans that might be right.


Next up - to compare, we’re heading to Target to try out their Merona “Fit Solutions” jeans, which are also known as their “tummy panel” jeans. Can such support be found for a third of the price?

5.08.2010

Avert Your Eyes, The Glare May Hurt


I've been reluctant to embrace the steaming hot weather since my legs are so white people have to look away when I walk by. I've been sweating it out in jeans, until today.



And wrap dresses are...complicated. They tend to fly open in the breeze, and this one sat in my closet for a while before making it's debut. But once I got it on I remembered that it snaps at the cleavage and wraps well around my legs. Even a stiff breeze couldn't move it, and that makes this dress my new go-to.


Plus, purple.


The shoes were last year's on-sale Aerosoles, a totally loser brand that has somehow emerged from the ashes of nursing clogs with unbelievably comfortable and great looking heels. I wore these suckers all day, to and from the preschool and errands and lunch-making and nap-giving, unscathed and exceedingly comfortable.


Of course, Target is so fast to take items off their shelves and websites that this dress is no longer available, but
something just like it is here. And the shoes are still on sale, here.